Evidence and active urban environment: A qualitative study of how stakeholders in three English local authority areas use evidence in decision making for ‘active living’ infrastructure

Anna Le Gouais, Cornelia Guell, Louise Foley, David Ogilvie

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference Contribution (Conference Proceeding)

Abstract

Introduction: Urban design has the potential to influence population
levels of physical activity and subsequent health impacts. This qualitative
study investigates how decisions are made for ‘active living’ infrastructure
(walking and cycling infrastructure and open space), and particularly how
evidence is used by different stakeholders.
Method: The research involves three purposively selected local authority
areas in England. Qualitative data is collected predominantly through
semi-structure interviews, and to a lesser extent ethnographic observations.
Participants were chosen using snowball sampling with key stakeholders
such as planners, public health, new communities, developers and councillors. 6-10 participants are included for each case study area. Interviews
are audio-recorded with consent and transcribed verbatim. Data analysis is
supported using qualitative data analysis software NVivo 10.
Results: Decision making may be influenced via multiple ‘windows of
opportunity’. Funding opportunities, elected members’ personal opinions,
the persuasiveness of pressure groups, willingness to take risks, organisational culture, developers’ attitudes and personal relationships all influence
design outcomes. Different types of evidence are used by different
stakeholders, ranging from systematic reviews and bespoke research, to
population data, transport monitoring and national standards. Economic arguments for ‘active living’ infrastructure receive mixed support from
stakeholders – its potential for better design must contend with scepticism
and limited mechanisms to influence planning negotiations.
Conclusion: Stakeholders vary in the types of data and evidence used for
decision making. Better understanding of decision making processes
between stakeholders, as well as clearer health-related evidence and cost
effectiveness data could help to enable healthier neighbourhoods.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationJournal of Physical Activity & Health
PagesS80-S81
Volume15
Editions1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2018
Event7th International Society for Physical Activity and Health Congress - London, United Kingdom
Duration: 15 Oct 201817 Oct 2018

Conference

Conference7th International Society for Physical Activity and Health Congress
Country/TerritoryUnited Kingdom
CityLondon
Period15/10/1817/10/18

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evidence and active urban environment: A qualitative study of how stakeholders in three English local authority areas use evidence in decision making for ‘active living’ infrastructure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this