Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Evolution or revolution: where next for impact assessment?

  • Claire Gronow

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

    33 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Impact assessment (IA) has become one of the most prevalent environmental policy instruments today. Its introduction under the National Environmental Policy Act (US) in 1969 was revolutionary. Perhaps it is not surprising, then, that such a widely used tool has received its share of criticism, including that it fails to meet some of its fundamental goals. Over the last fifty years, IA has broadened in scope and application and embraced new techniques. It has followed evolved, but has not changed fundamentally. We believe that IA must continue to change to meet the societal and environmental challenges of the 21st century. But will it be enough for IA to progress through incremental change (evolution), or is a complete overhaul of impact assessment (revolution) needed? We provide some ideas as to what ‘evolution’ and ‘revolution’ may look like, but rather then offering a definitive way forward now, we invite stakeholders to present their thoughts and suggestions at the IAIA19 Annual Conference in Brisbane, which carries the same theme as the title of this article.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalImpact Assessment and Project Appraisal
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2 Nov 2018

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Evolution or revolution: where next for impact assessment?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this