Examining the effectiveness of general practitioner and nurse promotion of electronic cigarettes versus standard care for smoking reduction and abstinence in hardcore smokers with smoking-related chronic disease: protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Rachna Begh, Tim Coleman, Lucy Yardley, Rebecca Barnes, Felix Naughton, Hazel Gilbert, Anne Ferrey, Claire Madigan, Nicola Williams, Louisa Hamilton, Yolanda Warren, Jenna Grabey, Miranda Clark, Anne Dickinson, Paul Aveyard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)
291 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background:
Despite the clear harm associated with smoking tobacco, many people with smoking-related chronic diseases or serious mental illnesses (SMI) are unwilling or unable to stop smoking. In many cases, these smokers have tried and exhausted all methods to stop smoking and yet clinicians are repeatedly mandated to offer them during routine consultations. Providing nicotine through electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes), may reduce the adverse health consequences associated with tobacco smoking, but these are not currently offered. The aim of this study is to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of general practitioners (GPs) and nurses delivering a brief advice intervention on e-cigarettes and offering an e-cigarette starter pack and patient support resources compared with standard care in smokers with smoking-related chronic diseases or SMI who are unwilling to stop smoking.

Methods/design:
This is an individually randomised, blinded, two-arm trial. Smokers with a smoking-related chronic condition or SMI with no intention of stopping smoking will be recruited through primary care registers. Eligible participants will be randomised to one of two groups if they decline standard care for stopping smoking: a control group who will receive no additional support beyond standard care, or an intervention group who will receive GP or nurse-led brief advice about e-cigarettes, an e-cigarette starter pack with accompanying practical support booklet, and telephone support from experienced vapers and online video tutorials. The primary outcome measures will be smoking reduction, measured through changes in cigarettes per day and 7-day point-prevalence abstinence at two months. Secondary outcomes include smoking reduction, 7-day point-prevalence abstinence and prolonged abstinence at eight months. Other outcomes include patient recruitment and follow-up, patient uptake and use of e-cigarettes, nicotine intake, contamination of randomisation and practitioner adherence to the delivery of the intervention. Qualitative interviews will be conducted in a subsample of practitioners, patients and the vape team to garner their reactions to the programme.

Discussion:
This is the first randomised controlled trial to investigate whether e-cigarette provision alongside a brief intervention delivered by practitioners leads to reduced smoking and abstinence among smokers with smoking-related chronic diseases or SMI.
Original languageEnglish
Article number659 (2019)
Number of pages16
JournalTrials
Volume20
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Nov 2019

Bibliographical note

This report is independent research arising from a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Postdoctoral Fellowship awarded to Dr Rachna Begh, PDF-2016-09-043, and NIHR School for Primary Care Research project grant (project reference 333). The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR, NHS, Health Education England or the Department of Health and Social Care.

Research Groups and Themes

  • Tobacco and Alcohol

Keywords

  • Smoking
  • Cessation
  • Electronic Cigarettes
  • Primary Care
  • Treatment
  • Addiction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Examining the effectiveness of general practitioner and nurse promotion of electronic cigarettes versus standard care for smoking reduction and abstinence in hardcore smokers with smoking-related chronic disease: protocol for a randomised controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this