Exceeding the recruitment target in a primary care paediatric trial: an evaluation of the Choice of Moisturiser for Eczema Treatment (COMET) feasibility randomised controlled trial

Kingsley Powell, Victoria Wilson, Niamh Redmond, Daisy Gaunt, Matthew Ridd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)

3 Citations (Scopus)
256 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Recruiting to target in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of investigational medicinal products (CTIMPs) in primary care and paediatric populations is notoriously difficult. More evidence is needed for effective recruitment strategies in these settings. We report on the impact of different recruitment strategies used in the COMET study – a feasibility trial comparing the effectiveness of four emollients for the treatment of childhood eczema – recruiting via general practice (GP) surgeries.

Methods: Initially, 16 GP practices invited potentially eligible children to take part in the trial by sending an invitation letter (self-referral pathway) or by consenting and randomising them into the study during a visit at the practice (in-consultation referral). Measures implemented during the study to maximise accrual included: signing-up six additional GP practices; increasing the upper age limit eligibility criterion from 3 to 5 years; and permitting healthcare professionals other than doctors to confirm participant eligibility. We used descriptive statistics and univariate linear regression models to explore association with practice recruitment rates.

Results: 197 participants were recruited, exceeding the target of 160. 107 children entered via self-referral and 90 by in-consultation pathways. 12.6% recruited were aged between 3 and 5 years (the raised upper age limit). The six additional practices contributed 37.4% (40/107) of participants recruited by self-referral. Only a third (18/56, 32.1%) of potential recruiting clinicians recruited one or more participants in-consultation which was a more problematic pathway due to data verification issues. Three research nurses and a pharmacist from four practices recruited 48.9% (44/90) of participants via this pathway. Univariate linear regression models showed no evidence of association between the number of children recruited via the self-referral pathway by practice and practice list size (p=0.092) or practice deprivation decile (p=0.270) but practice deprivation was associated with a higher number of children recruited in-consultation (p=0.020) by practice.

Conclusions: Self-referral and in-consultation recruitment yielded similar numbers but the in-consultation pathway was more problematic. Future trials of this type should consider the condition, normal care pathway, and number of potentially eligible children and be prepared to use multiple recruitment strategies to achieve recruitment targets.
Original languageEnglish
Article number550
Number of pages10
JournalTrials
Volume17
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Nov 2016

Structured keywords

  • BRTC
  • BTC (Bristol Trials Centre)

Keywords

  • Eczema
  • Recruitment
  • Randomised controlled trials
  • Children
  • Primary care

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Exceeding the recruitment target in a primary care paediatric trial: an evaluation of the Choice of Moisturiser for Eczema Treatment (COMET) feasibility randomised controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Projects

    ConDuCT-II

    Blazeby, J. M.

    1/04/1431/03/19

    Project: Research

    Cite this