Abstract
This paper presents an alternative to the market-oriented approach to executive pay. The pay for performance requirement and shareholder ‘say-on-pay’ have not worked as a corporate governance formula for controlling levels of pay for directors of large public companies. The financial press continues to report “excessive” payments. An ethical, socially-oriented distributive justice framework is necessary. This paper explains the problems with the market justice approach and suggests that we need to consider the social and political implications of a growing wealth and income gap. This leads to a different set of requirements that are much broader than pay-for-performance and shareholder power. If the framework is adopted this could lead to an improved corporate governance system as well as a more equal and inclusive society.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 139-154 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Company Lawyer |
Volume | 37 |
Issue number | 5 |
Publication status | Published - 6 May 2016 |
Keywords
- executive pay, distributive justice, pay for performance, Rawls
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Executive Pay: A socially-oriented distributive justice framework'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Professor Charlotte L Villiers
- University of Bristol Law School - Professor of Company Law
Person: Academic