Abstract
This interjection is a consideration of the importance of experimental history in the rediscovery of costume for the stage, without which designers, productions, and material knowledge would continue to go largely undocumented. Reusing the practice as research methodologies used by theatrical scholars such as Gilli Bush-Baily, experimental history allows the scholar to piece together existing inconsistencies and scarcities in recorded information and offers them a greater insight into the visual aspect of the design, along with the successes and failures which may have led to the existing scarcity of recorded information. In the case of costume history, drawn designs, photographs or posters often long outlive the physical object, and while some of the written documentation may survive, it is much less common to see these types of physical records in archives. Material considerations are significant for the development of the design, from durability to weight, to aesthetic impact on the stage, the design drawings do little to suggest these nuances. And it is these nuances which can often lead to the success or failure of that design. With these types of material archives lost, it is the place of experimental history to piece back together elements of the productions.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Publication status | Published - 2 Sept 2023 |
| Event | Replicas. Reconstructions, and Recreations: Defining Terms of Historical Making - Duration: 2 Sept 2023 → 2 Sept 2023 https://makinghistoricaldress.dmu.ac.uk/Workshop-One.html |
Conference
| Conference | Replicas. Reconstructions, and Recreations |
|---|---|
| Period | 2/09/23 → 2/09/23 |
| Internet address |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Experimental Archaeology in the Rediscovery of Lost Costume'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver