Abstract
I discuss two puzzling and neglected passages in the Critique of Practical Reason, namely, V:92 and V:163. In these passages Kant claims that practical philosophers should follow the paradigm of the chemist and conduct experiments on common human reason. I explain Kant’s conception of the chemical experiment, provide a detailed interpretation of the two passages in question, and conclude by applying the structure of the chemical experiment to the Analytic of the Critique of Practical Reason. Chemical experiments as a model of ethics should be understood as a method of confirming that a philosophical theory systematizes and defends ideas that ordinary rational agents are already committed to.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 41-64 |
Number of pages | 23 |
Journal | Idealistic Studies |
Volume | 46 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Mar 2017 |