Expert Review on Spontaneous Pneumothorax: Advances, Controversies, and New Directions

Eleanor C Barton, Nick A Maskell*, Steven Walker

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article (Academic Journal)peer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

For decades, there has been scanty evidence, most of which is of poor quality, to guide clinicians in the assessment and management of pneumothorax. A recent surge in pneumothorax research has begun to address controversies surrounding the topic and change the face of pneumothorax management. In this article, we review controversies concerning the etiology, pathogenesis, and classification of pneumothorax, and discuss recent advances in its management, including conservative and ambulatory management. We review the evidence base for the challenges of managing pneumothorax, including persistent air leak, and suggest new directions for future research that can help provide patient-centered, evidence-based management for this challenging cohort of patients.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)426-436
Number of pages11
JournalSeminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Volume44
Issue number4
Early online date15 Jun 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2023

Research Groups and Themes

  • Academic Respiratory Unit

Keywords

  • Academic Respiratory Unit

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Expert Review on Spontaneous Pneumothorax: Advances, Controversies, and New Directions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this