Skip to content

Explaining Fixed Effects: Random Effects modelling of Time-Series Cross-Sectional and Panel Data

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)133-153
JournalPolitical Science Research and Methods
Volume3
Issue number1
Early online date1 May 2014
DOIs
DateE-pub ahead of print - 1 May 2014
DatePublished (current) - Jan 2015

Abstract

This article challenges Fixed Effects (FE) modelling as the ‘default’ for time-series-cross-sectional and panel data. Understanding differences between within- and between-effects is crucial when choosing modelling strategies. The downside of Random Effects (RE) modelling – correlated lower-level covariates and higher-level residuals – is omitted-variable bias, solvable with Mundlak’s (1978a) formulation. Consequently, RE can provide everything FE promises and more, and this is confirmed by Monte-Carlo simulations, which additionally show problems with another alternative, Plümper and Troeger’s Fixed Effects Vector Decomposition method, when data are unbalanced. As well as being able to model time-invariant variables, RE is readily extendable, with random coefficients, cross-level interactions, and complex variance functions. An empirical example shows that disregarding these extensions can produce misleading results. We argue not simply for technical solutions to endogeneity, but for the substantive importance of context and heterogeneity, modelled using RE. The implications extend beyond political science, to all multilevel datasets.

Download statistics

No data available

Documents

Documents

  • FixedvsRandom

    Rights statement: Material on these pages is copyright Cambridge University Press or reproduced with permission from other copyright owners. It may be downloaded and printed for personal reference, but not otherwise copied, altered in any way or transmitted to others (unless explicitly stated otherwise) without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. Hypertext links to other Web locations are for the convenience of users and do not constitute any endorsement or authorisation by Cambridge University Press.

    Accepted author manuscript, 767 KB, PDF document

Links

DOI

View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups