Abstract
Inhibition is one of the core components of cognitive control. In experimental tasks which measure cognitive inhibition, performance may vary according to an interplay of individuals’ chronotype and the time of day of testing (“synchrony effect”, or the beneficial impact on cognitive performance of aligning testing with the time of day preferred by an individual’s chronotype). Some prior studies have reported a synchrony effect specifically emerging in activities which require cognitive inhibition, but not in general processing speed, but existing findings are inconsistent. If genuine, synchrony effects should be taken into account when comparing groups of participants. Here we explored whether synchrony effects emerge in a sample of young adults. In a multi-part online study, we captured various components of inhibition (response suppression; inhibitory control; switching) plus a general measure of processing speed across various times of the day. Individuals’ chronotype was included as a predictor of performance. Critically, we found no evidence of a synchrony effect (an association between chronotype and component of interest where the directionality is dependent on time-of-testing) in our study.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1209-1223 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Chronobiology International - The Journal of Biological and Medical Rhythm Research |
Volume | 40 |
Issue number | 9 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 12 Sept 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This study was funded by the Leverhulme Trust [Research grant: RPG-2019-054] to the second author. We would like to thank Wenting Ye, Polly Barr, and Ethan Crossfield for providing their valuable feedback on this manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
Keywords
- Circadian rhythm
- synchrony effects
- Inhibition
- task switching
- processing speed