Exploring the performance of experimentally benchmarked RC bridge pier models when subjected to sequential seismic shocks

In this paper we explore the performance of RC bridge piers to seismic ground motion sequences, using both experimental and numerical models. Four RC columns were tested on the University of Bristol’s shake table. These columns contained both well-confined and poor-confined cases. Spectrally matched by near-field without pulse (NFWP), near-field pulse-like (NFPL) and far-field (FF) ground motion records where employed in a sequential/progressive fashion ranging from (I) slight damage (II) extensive damage (III) complete damage and (IV) aftershock cases. These experimental test results are then used to develop a benchmarked OpenSees model of this bridge pier. The importance of the concrete tension constitutive model is highlighted. The differences between sequential (progressive damage) and neglecting sequential seismic events are discussed. The benchmarked model is then used for a heuristic case using incremental dynamic analyses. A comparison is made between drift and energy dissipation performance measures, that suggests drift cannot identify the increased system damage induced by sequential events.