Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Fashion’s Relation to the "Geo": from Global Impacts to Earthly Practices

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (Academic Journal) › peer-review

Abstract

This paper stages a radical rethinking of the relation between fashion and the ‘geo’. Fashion studies, within and beyond geography, have largely articulated this relation through ‘global’ modes of thought, which also deploy problematic concepts of capitalist ‘progress’, placing fashion within a linear and Eurocentric geohistory of modernization, industry and ‘Anthropocene’. What’s more, such approaches often maintain clear boundaries between humans and other earthly forces. We argue these tendencies must be undone if we are to comprehend that fashion operates beyond globalized industry and is a result of the earth’s lively and agentic matter(s) and forces, not just a producer of its waste and environmental impact. To achieve this, we rethink fashion in geohistorical and geophilosophical terms. By doing so, we show how to comprehend the complexity and contingency of divergent fashion geohistories beyond "the Anthropocene" and practice fashion "after progress", where fashioning becomes capable of recognising and expressing the contingency and precarity of earthly beings and things. Taken overall, this paper appeals to geographers and fashion scholars to take both fashion and earth seriously as implicated matters of history, thought and practice.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1407-1423
Number of pages17
JournalAnnals of the Association of American Geographers
Volume115
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Apr 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Research Groups and Themes

  • Historical and Cultural Geographies Research Group

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fashion’s Relation to the "Geo": from Global Impacts to Earthly Practices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this