Feasibility of a reconfigured domestic violence and abuse training and support intervention responding to affected women, men, children and young people through primary care

Eszter Szilassy*, Caroline M Coope, Elizabeth S Emsley, Emma Williamson, Estela Capelas Barbosa, Medina Johnson, Anna Dowrick, Gene S Feder

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

Abstract

Background
Identification in UK general practice of women affected by domestic violence and abuse (DVA) is increasing, but men and children/young people (CYP) are rarely identified and referred for specialist support. To address this gap, we collaborated with IRISi (UK social enterprise) to strengthen elements of the IRIS + intervention which included the identification of men, direct engagement with CYP, and improved guidance on responding to information received from other agencies. IRIS + was an adaptation of the national IRIS (Identification and Referral to Improve Safety) model focused on the needs of women victim-survivors of DVA. Without diminishing the responses to women, IRIS + also responded to the needs of men experiencing or perpetrating DVA, and CYP living with DVA and/or experiencing it in their own relationships. Our study tested the feasibility of the adapted IRIS + intervention in England and Wales between 2019–21.

Methods
We used mixed method analysis to triangulate data from various sources (pre/post intervention questionnaires with primary care clinicians; data extracted from medical records and DVA agencies; semi-structured interviews with clinicians, service providers and referred adults and children) to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the IRIS + intervention.

Results
The rate of referral for women doubled (21.6/year/practice) from the rate (9.29/year/practice) in the original IRIS trial. The intervention also enabled identification and direct referral of CYP (15% of total referrals) and men (mostly survivors, 10% of total referrals). Despite an increase in self-reported clinician preparedness to respond to all patient groups, the intervention generated a low number of men perpetrator referrals (2% of all referrals). GPs were the principal patient referrers. Over two-thirds of referred women and CYP and almost half of all referred men were directly supported by the service. Many CYP also received IRIS + support indirectly, via the referred parents. Men and CYP supported by IRIS + reported improved physical and mental health, wellbeing, and confidence.

Conclusions
Although the study showed acceptability and feasibility, there remains uncertainty about the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and scalability of IRIS + . Building on the success of this feasibility study, the next step should be trialling the effectiveness of IRIS + implementation to inform service implementation decisions.
Original languageEnglish
Article number38
JournalBMC Primary Care
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Jan 2024

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The clinical training was co-delivered by an AE, a social worker specialised in children and DVA, and a local IRIS + clinical lead (practising general practitioner (GP) with an expertise in DVA). Advocacy support for adult patients was provided by the AEs. CYP were supported by the children and young persons’ workers (CYPW). The AEs and the CYPWs were based in local voluntary sector DVA agencies (IRIS + hubs) in the intervention sites. They received referrals from clinicians and provided expert advocacy to referred women and men adults and CYP affected by DVA. The clinical training was adapted to be relevant locally.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024, The Author(s).

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Feasibility of a reconfigured domestic violence and abuse training and support intervention responding to affected women, men, children and young people through primary care'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this