Feeling our way through politics

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter in a book

Abstract

Anger, fear, grief, shame and other negative emotions have been at the heart of political events in recent years. These are emotions that have long been subject to suspicion in political scholarship. There are some good reasons for this. Negative emotions can be politically destructive, leading people to act rashly and without due concern for democratic principles or fellow citizens. Arguably, the rise of far-right populism and the protests against restrictions during the COVID pandemic both testify to this. But, in condemning the vices of negative emotions, it is easy to overlook their virtues. They can, for example, accurately signal that we have been wronged, that we have done something wrong, or that something we value is threatened, and motivate us to act to redress the situation, sometimes in concert with other people. Indeed, the capacity of emotions like fear and anger to do just this has been on display in the Black Lives Matter and climate change movements. This volume brings together perspectives from philosophy and political science to shed new light on negative emotions in public life, highlighting both the constructive and destructive potential of these experiences. Each chapter investigates what recent political events in different parts of the world reveal about the political character of an emotion or particular set of emotions. These include much-discussed emotions, like anger and fear, and less prominent ones, like frustration and discomfort. The overall result is a dynamic set of tools that can help us better understand and navigate our current crises.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Politics of Negative Emotions
EditorsDan Degerman
Place of PublicationBristol
PublisherUniversity of Bristol Press
Pages1-9
Number of pages9
ISBN (Electronic)9781529228816
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Apr 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Feeling our way through politics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this