‘Firm but Fair’? Migrant Children’s Rights through Dramaturgy and Nation Branding in Norway and the UK

Devyani Prabhat*, Marie Louise Seeberg

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

Abstract

Applying nation branding literature and the work of Erving Goffman on dramaturgy to the situation of asylum-seeking children in Norway and in the UK, this paper develops a comparative framework for understanding why child rights appear to be de-prioritised in the current climate of ‘migration control’. The paper identifies historically grounded differential approaches towards child rights and children in the two countries, which currently appear to merge into a common trajectory of migration control, framed in terms of national security and economic productivity. It explores similar tensions in both countries between the discourses of national migration management on the one hand and children's welfare and rights on the other. It finds that universal rights which should protect the welfare of all children are limited and fragmented by ideas of nationalism and foreignness. Despite a more robust legal framework for child rights, Norway is on a similar pathway as the UK; a worrying indictment of how nations fulfil their obligations towards children.
Original languageEnglish
Article number35
Number of pages16
JournalComparative Migration Studies
Volume12
Issue number1
Early online date22 Aug 2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 22 Aug 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.

Keywords

  • Child rights
  • firm but fair
  • strict but fair
  • hostile environment
  • nation branding
  • migration control

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '‘Firm but Fair’? Migrant Children’s Rights through Dramaturgy and Nation Branding in Norway and the UK'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this