TY - JOUR
T1 - First Dental Steps intervention
T2 - feasibility study of a health visitor led infant oral health improvement programme.
AU - Williams, Joanna G
AU - Albers, Patricia Nicole
AU - El-Yousfi, Sarab
AU - Marshman, Zoe
AU - Patel, Reena
AU - Porter, Alice
AU - d'Apice, Katrina
AU - Breheny, Katie
AU - de Vocht, Frank
AU - Metcalfe, Chris
AU - Witton, Robert
AU - Kipping, Ruth
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.
PY - 2025/7/3
Y1 - 2025/7/3
N2 - BACKGROUND: In England, dental caries is common (22.4% of 5-year-olds, 2024) and the primary reason for hospital admission of children. First Dental Steps (FDS), an intervention in South West England, includes training for health visitors, integrating oral health advice into home visits and provision of oral health packs (a free flow cup, toothbrush and 1450ppm fluoride toothpaste) to vulnerable families at the 1-year developmental check. The aim was to conduct a feasibility study of FDS to support parents to increase infant toothbrushing.METHODS: This study explored the feasibility and acceptability of the FDS intervention and research methods in 5 local authority areas in South West England and 4 comparison sites. Data collection (June 2021-February 2022) included baseline and follow-up questionnaires (mean 5 months), semi-structured interviews with parents (n = 16), health visitors (n = 7), and stakeholders (n = 16). Analysis of questionnaires was descriptive, and interviews were analysed using the framework method.RESULTS: Parents completed baseline (n = 59) and follow-up questionnaires (n = 26), with 10 parents (40%) reporting an increase in brushing frequency and 4 families (15%) reported visiting a dentist. From the interview data, five themes were identified 1) acceptability of the intervention, 2) feasibility of the intervention (delivery and implementation), 3) possible benefits of the intervention, 4) acceptability of study methods, and 5) suggested improvements. The FDS intervention was seen to be acceptable and feasible to those who took part, however, challenges with recruitment and retention demonstrate that obtaining data for a full trial would not be feasible.CONCLUSIONS: Parents, health visitors and stakeholders who took part in our study found FDS to be acceptable and feasible. Recruitment, retention and study methods (completing participant flow table) were challenging, and the progression criteria for the research methods were not met to progress to a full trial. Modifications were recommended to improve the intervention and further co-production approaches could be used to ensure it is culturally appropriate in a diverse population.
AB - BACKGROUND: In England, dental caries is common (22.4% of 5-year-olds, 2024) and the primary reason for hospital admission of children. First Dental Steps (FDS), an intervention in South West England, includes training for health visitors, integrating oral health advice into home visits and provision of oral health packs (a free flow cup, toothbrush and 1450ppm fluoride toothpaste) to vulnerable families at the 1-year developmental check. The aim was to conduct a feasibility study of FDS to support parents to increase infant toothbrushing.METHODS: This study explored the feasibility and acceptability of the FDS intervention and research methods in 5 local authority areas in South West England and 4 comparison sites. Data collection (June 2021-February 2022) included baseline and follow-up questionnaires (mean 5 months), semi-structured interviews with parents (n = 16), health visitors (n = 7), and stakeholders (n = 16). Analysis of questionnaires was descriptive, and interviews were analysed using the framework method.RESULTS: Parents completed baseline (n = 59) and follow-up questionnaires (n = 26), with 10 parents (40%) reporting an increase in brushing frequency and 4 families (15%) reported visiting a dentist. From the interview data, five themes were identified 1) acceptability of the intervention, 2) feasibility of the intervention (delivery and implementation), 3) possible benefits of the intervention, 4) acceptability of study methods, and 5) suggested improvements. The FDS intervention was seen to be acceptable and feasible to those who took part, however, challenges with recruitment and retention demonstrate that obtaining data for a full trial would not be feasible.CONCLUSIONS: Parents, health visitors and stakeholders who took part in our study found FDS to be acceptable and feasible. Recruitment, retention and study methods (completing participant flow table) were challenging, and the progression criteria for the research methods were not met to progress to a full trial. Modifications were recommended to improve the intervention and further co-production approaches could be used to ensure it is culturally appropriate in a diverse population.
KW - Humans
KW - Feasibility Studies
KW - Infant
KW - Oral Health
KW - Toothbrushing
KW - England
KW - Dental Caries/prevention & control
KW - Female
KW - Parents/education
KW - Male
KW - Surveys and Questionnaires
KW - House Calls
KW - Health Promotion/methods
U2 - 10.1186/s12903-025-06154-4
DO - 10.1186/s12903-025-06154-4
M3 - Article (Academic Journal)
C2 - 40611145
SN - 1472-6831
VL - 25
SP - 1087
JO - BMC Oral Health
JF - BMC Oral Health
IS - 1
M1 - 1087
ER -