Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Flipping Sensemaking on its Head: From common sense to sensus communis

  • Robin Holt
  • , Rene Wiedner*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Sensemaking provides a compelling account of how meaning emerges by theorizing the organizational enactment of order. In this paper we question the underlying assumption that making sense is equivalent to ordering. We draw from Hannah Arendt’s work to argue that restricting sense to ordering as a means of addressing practical concerns is limiting, and even dehumanizing, and that the most profound forms of sense may emerge from disrupting rather than restoring order. In questioning the intimacy between sense and order, we also question the commonsense view that organization seeks practical settlements, certainty and reliability. Following Arendt, we pursue the question of what it means to organize for plural opinion-making, a condition she conceptualizes as sensus communis. The upshot is to flip sensemaking on its head: rather than meaning being generated through organizing, and certain types of disruption merely triggering it, sense is made through disruption, with certain types of organizing enabling it.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1253-1275
    Number of pages23
    JournalOrganization Studies
    Volume45
    Issue number9
    Early online date26 Jul 2024
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2024

    Bibliographical note

    Publisher Copyright:
    © The Author(s) 2024.

    Research Groups and Themes

    • MGMT Strategy International Management and Business and Entrepreneurship

    Keywords

    • Arendt
    • phenomenology
    • pragmatism
    • sensemaking
    • sensus communis

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Flipping Sensemaking on its Head: From common sense to sensus communis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this