Abstract
This paper argues that a two-tier system has evolved dividing intra-UK/EU marriages from extra-UK/EU marriages. For the former, marriage is a contract between two individuals overseen by a facilitating state. For the latter, marriage has become more of a legal status defined and controlled by an intrusive and obstructive state. I argue that this divergence in legislating regulation is steeped in an ethnicized imagining of ‘Britishness’ whereby the more noticeably ‘other’ migrants (by skin colour or religion) are perceived as a threat to the national character. The conceptualization of women as legally ‘disabled’ citizens (1870 Naturalisation Act) for whom a state must act as responsible patriarch, is a fundamental part of this imagining of the nation. The paper therefore examines the social (gendered and ethnicized) assumptions and political aims embedded within the legislation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2758-2776 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Ethnic and Racial Studies |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue number | 15 |
| Early online date | 26 Apr 2016 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Research Groups and Themes
- Migration Mobilities Bristol
- Marriage
- Migration
- SPAIS Centre for the Study of Ethnicity and Citizenship
Keywords
- Immigration
- intersectionality
- gender
- law
- marriage
- migration
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of ''For her protection and benefit': the regulation of marriage-related migration to the UK'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Dr Natasha Carver
- School for Policy Studies - Senior Lecturer
- Migration Mobilities Bristol
Person: Academic , Member
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver