Foregrounding co-production: building research relationships in university-community collaborative research

Nathan Eisenstadt, Josie Mclellan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

140 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Emerging scholarship on university-community co-production rightly emphasises the importance of preparatory work to build research partnerships. Such preparation creates the necessary common ground on which to build a meaningful collaborative relationship. Drawing on our experiences on a large university-community co-production experiment in historical mapping, we argue that this work is particularly important in partnerships where relationships are characterised by difference. If academics wish to work with individuals and groups beyond the bounds of those with whom they already agree, foregrounding co-production is a critical component. We identify three dimensions of ‘foregrounding’ co-production: practical, epistemological and affective. Each become increasingly important in cases where communities lack trust in or actively mistrust the university. Understanding and navigating difference, historic harm and power asymmetries can be time-intensive, and may require a re-orientation of the relationship between process and output in collaborative projects such that initially intended aims are not met. In order to encourage co-production across difference, we conclude that foregrounding should be valued as an end or ‘output’ in and of itself.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)242-256
Number of pages15
JournalResearch for All
Volume4
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Sept 2020

Keywords

  • co-production
  • university-community research
  • foregrounding
  • difference

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Foregrounding co-production: building research relationships in university-community collaborative research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this