Abstract
How do we get in trouble in philosophy and what do pictures have to do with it? In this article I address Frank Ebersole’s thoughts on (Wittgenstein’s remarks on) pictures in philosophy. I identify the puzzlement generated for Ebersole by what Wittgenstein says and also consider some puzzling aspects of Ebersole’s own renderings of pictures. I distinguish between the philosophical picture and the pictorial form in which it may be crystalized and show how philosophy’s reliance on situationally dis-embedded grammatical stories (pictorial or not) leads us into trouble. Accordingly, responding to such trouble does not consist in recovering the picture, in the sense of a single “object” or image we had before our mind’s eye, but in – what is better de-scribed as Ebersole’s strategy of– supplying a grammatical example (pictorial or otherwise) to go with our thinking, an example that makes what we think and say clear to ourselves.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 746-759 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Metaphilosophy |
Volume | 54 |
Issue number | 5 |
Early online date | 22 Sept 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:I would like to thank an anonymous referee for valuable feedback on an earlier version of this article.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Metaphilosophy published by Metaphilosophy LLC and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Structured keywords
- Social and Political Theory
Keywords
- Frank Ebersole
- Wittgenstein
- philosophical pictures
- philosophical puzzlement
- images