TY - JOUR
T1 - Free to choose? Reform, choice, and consideration sets in the english national health service
T2 - Reform, Choice and Consideration Sets in the English National Health Service
AU - Gaynor, Martin
AU - Propper, Carol
AU - Seiler, Stephan
PY - 2016/11/1
Y1 - 2016/11/1
N2 - Choice in public services is controversial. We exploit a reform in the English National Health Service to assess the effect of removing constraints on patient choice. We estimate a demand model that explicitly captures the removal of the choice constraints imposed on patients. We find that, post-removal, patients became more responsive to clinical quality. This led to a modest reduction in mortality and a substantial increase in patient welfare. The elasticity of demand faced by hospitals increased substantially post-reform and we find evidence that hospitals responded to the enhanced incentives by improving quality. This suggests greater choice can raise quality.
AB - Choice in public services is controversial. We exploit a reform in the English National Health Service to assess the effect of removing constraints on patient choice. We estimate a demand model that explicitly captures the removal of the choice constraints imposed on patients. We find that, post-removal, patients became more responsive to clinical quality. This led to a modest reduction in mortality and a substantial increase in patient welfare. The elasticity of demand faced by hospitals increased substantially post-reform and we find evidence that hospitals responded to the enhanced incentives by improving quality. This suggests greater choice can raise quality.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994248981&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1257/aer.20121532
DO - 10.1257/aer.20121532
M3 - Article (Academic Journal)
C2 - 29553210
AN - SCOPUS:84994248981
SN - 0002-8282
VL - 106
SP - 3521
EP - 3557
JO - American Economic Review
JF - American Economic Review
IS - 11
ER -