Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

From a ‘moral commentator’ to a ‘determined actor’?

Huw Thomas, Peter J Turnbull

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

    21 Citations (Scopus)
    208 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Collective action on the part of the International Labour Organization (ILO) has always been dependent on the ability of the International Labour Office, the permanent secretariat of the ILO, to orchestrate a consensus between the Organization’s tripartite constituents of Government, Employer and Worker representatives. This consensus fell with the Berlin Wall, prompting the Office to bypass states by engaging with external interactants in order to promote international labour standards and decent work. Most recently, in order to shift the emphasis from ‘moral commentary’ to ‘determined action’, the Office has reverted to managing states, albeit in the face of determined Employer counter-framing. Employer opposition, supported by several member States, cannot be underestimated, as any orchestration within the international industrial relations field is contingent on concerted action.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)874-898
    Number of pages25
    JournalBritish Journal of Industrial Relations
    Volume59
    Issue number3
    Early online date4 Nov 2020
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2021

    Keywords

    • International Labour Organization (ILO)
    • orchestration
    • international labour standards
    • collective action framing

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'From a ‘moral commentator’ to a ‘determined actor’?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this