Abstract
In this reply to the eight commentaries to our article, we discuss three important challenges. First, we discuss the relationship of mirror-touch to other forms of synesthesia. We note that synesthetic experiences are generally not mistaken as veridical but this does not mean that they lack percept-like qualities. We acknowledge that neither Threshold Theory nor Self-Other Theory offer a direct account of other forms of synesthesia, although we discuss how the latter could. Second, we discuss alternative explanations. Notably predictive coding offers a different way of framing our current theory, and extending it to related phenomena. Finally, we discuss how mirror-touch synesthesia may relate to other atypical experiences of body ownership such as the rubber hand illusion, and somatoparaphrenia.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 224-227 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | Cognitive Neuroscience |
Volume | 8 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2 Oct 2017 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Keywords
- Mirror systems
- pain
- predictive coding
- self-other
- synesthesia
- touch