From mirror-touch synesthesia to models of vicarious experience: A reply to commentaries

Jamie Ward*, Michael J. Banissy

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

Abstract

In this reply to the eight commentaries to our article, we discuss three important challenges. First, we discuss the relationship of mirror-touch to other forms of synesthesia. We note that synesthetic experiences are generally not mistaken as veridical but this does not mean that they lack percept-like qualities. We acknowledge that neither Threshold Theory nor Self-Other Theory offer a direct account of other forms of synesthesia, although we discuss how the latter could. Second, we discuss alternative explanations. Notably predictive coding offers a different way of framing our current theory, and extending it to related phenomena. Finally, we discuss how mirror-touch synesthesia may relate to other atypical experiences of body ownership such as the rubber hand illusion, and somatoparaphrenia.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)224-227
Number of pages4
JournalCognitive Neuroscience
Volume8
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Oct 2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

  • Mirror systems
  • pain
  • predictive coding
  • self-other
  • synesthesia
  • touch

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'From mirror-touch synesthesia to models of vicarious experience: A reply to commentaries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this