Abstract
In this reply to the eight commentaries to our article, we discuss three important challenges. First, we discuss the relationship of mirror-touch to other forms of synesthesia. We note that synesthetic experiences are generally not mistaken as veridical but this does not mean that they lack percept-like qualities. We acknowledge that neither Threshold Theory nor Self-Other Theory offer a direct account of other forms of synesthesia, although we discuss how the latter could. Second, we discuss alternative explanations. Notably predictive coding offers a different way of framing our current theory, and extending it to related phenomena. Finally, we discuss how mirror-touch synesthesia may relate to other atypical experiences of body ownership such as the rubber hand illusion, and somatoparaphrenia.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 224-227 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Cognitive Neuroscience |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2 Oct 2017 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Keywords
- Mirror systems
- pain
- predictive coding
- self-other
- synesthesia
- touch
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'From mirror-touch synesthesia to models of vicarious experience: A reply to commentaries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver