From peptides to proteins: coiled-coil tetramers to single-chain 4-helix bundles

Elise A Naudin, Katherine I Albanese, Abigail J Smith, Bram Mylemans, Emily G Baker, Nigel J Savery, Dek N Woolfson, al et

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)
87 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The design of completely synthetic proteins from first principles—de novo protein design—is challenging. This is because, despite recent advances in computational protein–structure prediction and design, we do not understand fully the sequence-to-structure relationships for protein folding, assembly, and stabilization. Antiparallel 4-helix bundles are amongst the most studied scaffolds for de novo protein design. We set out to re-examine this target, and to determine clear sequence-to-structure relationships, or design rules, for the structure. Our aim was to determine a common and robust sequence background for designing multiple de novo 4-helix bundles. In turn, this could be used in chemical and synthetic biology to direct protein–protein interactions and as scaffolds for functional protein design. Our approach starts by analyzing known antiparallel 4-helix coiled-coil structures to deduce design rules. In terms of the heptad repeat, abcdefg—i.e., the sequence signature of many helical bundles—the key features that we identify are: a = Leu, d = Ile, e = Ala, g = Gln, and the use of complementary charged residues at b and c. Next, we implement these rules in the rational design of synthetic peptides to form antiparallel homo- and heterotetramers. Finally, we use the sequence of the homotetramer to derive in one step a single-chain 4-helix-bundle protein for recombinant production in E. coli. All of the assembled designs are confirmed in aqueous solution using biophysical methods, and ultimately by determining high-resolution X-ray crystal structures. Our route from peptides to proteins provides an understanding of the role of each residue in each design.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)11330-11340
Number of pages11
JournalChemical Science
Volume13
Issue number38
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Sept 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
EAN, AJS, NJS and DNW are supported by a Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) grant (BB/S002820/1). KIA, ODW and DNW are supported by a BBSRC-NSF grant (BB/V004220/1 and 2019598). BM and DNW are supported by a BBSRC grant (BB/V006231/1). We are also grateful to the Max Planck-Bristol Centre for Minimal Biology, which supports KIA, BM, and DNW. DNW was also supported by BrisEngBio, a BBSRC-funded Engineering Biology Research Centre (BB/L01386X/1), and a Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit Award (WM140008). ODW is grateful for a National Institutes of Health grant (GM-118167). We thank the University of Bristol, School of Chemistry, Mass Spectrometry Facility for access to the EPSRC-funded Bruker Ultraflex MALDI-TOF instrument (EP/K03927X/1) and to the Synapt G2S nanospray instrument. We would like to thank Diamond Light Source for access to beamlines I04 and I24 (Proposal mx23269) and the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) for access to beamline ID30B (Proposal mx2373). We thank Will Dawson, Prasun Kumar, Freddie Martin, and members of the Woolfson laboratory for helpful discussions.

Funding Information:
EAN, AJS, NJS and DNW are supported by a Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) grant (BB/S002820/1). KIA, ODW and DNW are supported by a BBSRC-NSF grant (BB/V004220/1 and 2019598). BM and DNW are supported by a BBSRC grant (BB/V006231/1). We are also grateful to the Max Planck-Bristol Centre for Minimal Biology, which supports KIA, BM, and DNW. DNW was also supported by BrisEngBio, a BBSRC-funded Engineering Biology Research Centre (BB/L01386X/1), and a Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit Award (WM140008). ODW is grateful for a National Institutes of Health grant (GM-118167). We thank the University of Bristol, School of Chemistry, Mass Spectrometry Facility for access to the EPSRC-funded Bruker Ultraflex MALDI-TOF instrument (EP/K03927X/1) and to the Synapt G2S nanospray instrument. We would like to thank Diamond Light Source for access to beamlines I04 and I24 (Proposal mx23269) and the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) for access to beamline ID30B (Proposal mx2373). We thank Will Dawson, Prasun Kumar, Freddie Martin, and members of the Woolfson laboratory for helpful discussions.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Royal Society of Chemistry.

Research Groups and Themes

  • BrisSynBio
  • Bristol BioDesign Institute
  • Max Planck Bristol

Keywords

  • synthetic biology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'From peptides to proteins: coiled-coil tetramers to single-chain 4-helix bundles'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this