Skip to content

From the political to the personal: work and class in 1970s British feminist art

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Article numberhwz030
Number of pages23
JournalTwentieth Century British History
Early online date12 Nov 2019
DOIs
DateAccepted/In press - 11 Sep 2019
DateE-pub ahead of print (current) - 12 Nov 2019

Abstract

How did British feminist art of the 1970s represent work and class, and what light does this shed on the women’s movement more generally? This article discusses the work of artists, including Bobby Baker, the Feministo and Fenix collectives, the Hackney Flashers, and Mary Kelly. These artists were eager to connect feminist activism to other struggles on the Left and were thus initially drawn to document working-class women’s paid work. Their political commitment to represent ‘ordinary’ working lives often led to lengthy periods of research, as well as attempts to make both the creative process and the finished product accessible to new participants and audiences. However, across this period, two changes took place. First, artists began to focus on women’s unpaid work, drawing attention to the tension between domestic work and paid employment, and the lack of easy solutions to this problem. Secondly, most lost faith in art’s power to represent the experience of work beyond the individual and the personal. Early political idealism gave way to sustained soul-searching about the intellectual, moral, and aesthetic difficulties of representing the experience of others, particularly those of a different class background. This article, then, shows that the early British women’s movement was keen to engage with working-class experience and that it did so in a way that was self-reflective. In the end, it was this self-reflection, and the questions that it generated about the morality, politics, and aesthetics of representing others, that led to the personal and psychological turn of the later 1970s.

Documents

Documents

  • Full-text PDF (author’s accepted manuscript)

    Rights statement: This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Oxford University Press at https://academic.oup.com/tcbh/advance-article/doi/10.1093/tcbh/hwz030/5622926 . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Accepted author manuscript, 299 KB, PDF document

    Embargo ends: 12/11/21

    Request copy

DOI

View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups