TY - JOUR
T1 - Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA)
T2 - The sSFR-M* relation part 1 - σsSFR-M* as a function of sample, SFR indicator and environment
AU - Davies, L.J.M.
AU - Lagos, C. del P.
AU - Katsianis, A.
AU - Robotham, A.S.G.
AU - Cortese, L.
AU - Driver, S.P.
AU - Bremer, Malcolm
AU - Brown, M.J.I.
AU - Brough, S.
AU - Cluver, M.E.
AU - Grootes, M.W.
AU - Holwerda, B.W.
AU - Owers, M.
AU - Phillipps, Steven
PY - 2019/2
Y1 - 2019/2
N2 - Recently a number of studies have proposed that the dispersion along the star formation rate - stellar mass relation (σsSFR-M*) is indicative of variations in star-formation history (SFH) driven by feedback processes. They found a `U'-shaped dispersion and attribute the increased scatter at low and high stellar masses to stellar and active galactic nuclei feed-back respectively. However, measuring σsSFR and the shape of the σsSFR-M* relation is problematic and can vary dramatically depending on the sample selected, chosen separation of passive/star-forming systems, and method of deriving star-formation rates (i.e. Hα emission vs spectral energy distribution fitting). As such, any astrophysical conclusions drawn from measurements of σsSFR must consider these dependencies. Here we use the Galaxy And Mass Assembly survey to explore how σsSFR varies with SFR indicator for a variety of selections for disc-like `main sequence' star-forming galaxies including colour, star-formation rate, visual morphology, bulge-to-total mass ratio, Sérsic index and mixture modelling. We find that irrespective of sample selection and/or SFR indicator, the dispersion along the sSFR-M* relation does follow a `U'-shaped distribution. This suggests that the shape is physical and not an artefact of sample selection or method. We then compare the σsSFR-M* relation to state-of-the-art hydrodynamical and semi-analytic models and find good agreement with our observed results. Finally, we find that for group satellites this `U'-shaped distribution is not observed due to additional high scatter populations at intermediate stellar masses.
AB - Recently a number of studies have proposed that the dispersion along the star formation rate - stellar mass relation (σsSFR-M*) is indicative of variations in star-formation history (SFH) driven by feedback processes. They found a `U'-shaped dispersion and attribute the increased scatter at low and high stellar masses to stellar and active galactic nuclei feed-back respectively. However, measuring σsSFR and the shape of the σsSFR-M* relation is problematic and can vary dramatically depending on the sample selected, chosen separation of passive/star-forming systems, and method of deriving star-formation rates (i.e. Hα emission vs spectral energy distribution fitting). As such, any astrophysical conclusions drawn from measurements of σsSFR must consider these dependencies. Here we use the Galaxy And Mass Assembly survey to explore how σsSFR varies with SFR indicator for a variety of selections for disc-like `main sequence' star-forming galaxies including colour, star-formation rate, visual morphology, bulge-to-total mass ratio, Sérsic index and mixture modelling. We find that irrespective of sample selection and/or SFR indicator, the dispersion along the sSFR-M* relation does follow a `U'-shaped distribution. This suggests that the shape is physical and not an artefact of sample selection or method. We then compare the σsSFR-M* relation to state-of-the-art hydrodynamical and semi-analytic models and find good agreement with our observed results. Finally, we find that for group satellites this `U'-shaped distribution is not observed due to additional high scatter populations at intermediate stellar masses.
KW - galaxies: evolution
KW - galaxies: general
KW - galaxies: groups: general
KW - galaxies: star formation
U2 - 10.1093/mnras/sty2957
DO - 10.1093/mnras/sty2957
M3 - Article (Academic Journal)
SN - 0035-8711
VL - 483
SP - 1881
EP - 1900
JO - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
JF - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
IS - 2
M1 - sty2957
ER -