Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Garfinkel on strategy: Using ethnomethodology to make sense of “rubbish strategy”

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper has three aims. First, it presents what the term ethnomethodology means and explains some of its central concepts and tenets. Second, the paper illustrates an ethnomethodological approach to studying strategy by drawing on a fieldwork study of the development of a waste management strategy in a UK Local Authority, conducted by the first author. Third, the distinctive approach that ethnomethodology takes to the study of social organization is presented in order to outline what it could offer to the understanding of strategic organization in particular. The paper concludes by discussing the insights that ethnomethodology can offer in the strategic management field, including existing applications and potential future lines of enquiry, particularly in the field known as Strategy-as-Practice. The conclusion advocates a move away from rational analytic models, proclamations and prescriptive treatments of strategy towards studying the more mundane work that enables strategic action to take place, notably the production of accounts of various kinds. It is argued that through accounts, members produce the social facts that generate 'strategies’ of various kinds. This necessitates studying fact production ‘in flight’. Strategic organization is thereby conceptualised as an ongoing achievement of member's ethno- methods for producing it.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)31-42
Number of pages12
JournalCritical Perspectives on Accounting
Volume53
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2018

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Ltd

Keywords

  • Ethnomethology
  • Garfinkel
  • Strategy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Garfinkel on strategy: Using ethnomethodology to make sense of “rubbish strategy”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this