Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Gender Differences in Student Evaluations of Teaching: Identification and Consequences

Research output: Working paper › Discussion paper

Abstract

Student Evaluations of Teaching (SETs) have been suggested as one possible cause for low representation of women among academic economists. While econometric analyses using control variables certainly report that SETs can be influenced by the gender of both teacher and student, such studies may still be biased if there is non-random allocation of teachers to teaching. Even if causal estimates of gender effects are unbiased, the inference that SETs contribute to gender discrimination is hazardous, since hiring or promotion committees would not have access to these controls when evaluating SETs. We use data from an Italian university to quantify the effect of controls on gender effects and conclude that there is insufficient evidence to blame SETs for a gender imbalance in Economics.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages35
Publication statusPublished - May 2021

Publication series

NameIZA Discussion Paper Series
No.14387

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 5 - Gender Equality
    SDG 5 Gender Equality

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gender Differences in Student Evaluations of Teaching: Identification and Consequences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this