Gender equity in academic rheumatology, current status and potential for improvement: a cross-sectional study to inform an EULAR task force

Pavel V Ovseiko, Laure Gossec, Laura Andreoli, Uta Kiltz, Leonieke van Mens, Neelam Hassan, Marike van der Leeden, Heidi J Siddle, Alessia Alunno, Iain B McInnes, Nemanja S Damjanov, Florence Apparailly, Caroline Ospelt, Irene E van der Horst-Bruinsma, Elena Nikiphorou, Katie L Druce, Zoltán Szekanecz, Alexandre Sepriano, Tadej Avcin, George BertsiasGeorg Schett, Anne-Maree Keenan, Linda H Pololi, Laura C Coates

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Evidence on the current status of gender equity in academic rheumatology in Europe and potential for its improvement is limited. The EULAR convened a task force to obtain empirical evidence on the potential unmet need for support of female rheumatologists, health professionals and non-clinical scientists in academic rheumatology.

METHODS: This cross-sectional study comprised three web-based surveys conducted in 2020 among: (1) EULAR scientific member society leaders, (2) EULAR and Emerging EULAR Network (EMEUNET) members and (3) EULAR Council members. Statistics were descriptive with significance testing for male/female responses assessed by χ2 test and t-test.

RESULTS: Data from EULAR scientific member societies in 13 countries indicated that there were disproportionately fewer women in academic rheumatology than in clinical rheumatology, and they tended to be under-represented in senior academic roles. From 324 responses of EULAR and EMEUNET members (24 countries), we detected no gender differences in leadership aspirations, self-efficacy in career advancement and work-life integration as well as the share of time spent on research, but there were gender differences in working hours and the levels of perceived gender discrimination and sexual harassment. There were gender differences in the ranking of 7 of 26 factors impacting career advancement and of 8 of 24 potential interventions to aid career advancement.

CONCLUSIONS: There are gender differences in career advancement in academic rheumatology. The study informs a EULAR task force developing a framework of potential interventions to accelerate gender-equitable career advancement in academic rheumatology.

Original languageEnglish
JournalRMD Open
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Aug 2022

Bibliographical note

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Keywords

  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Europe/epidemiology
  • Female
  • Gender Equity
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Rheumatologists
  • Rheumatology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gender equity in academic rheumatology, current status and potential for improvement: a cross-sectional study to inform an EULAR task force'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this