General practitioners' beliefs about the clinical utility of complementary and alternative medicine

Aron Jarvis, Rachel Perry, Debbie Smith, Rohini Terry, Sarah Peters

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

Abstract

AIM: To investigate GPs' beliefs about complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and its role in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Despite the prevalence of CAM in the United Kingdom, little is known about GPs beliefs regarding these alternative approaches to patient management and how they view it in relation to their clinical conduct and practice.

METHOD: A qualitative study conducted on 19 GPs recruited from the North West of England. Semi-structured telephone interviews were analysed using an inductive thematic analysis.

RESULTS: Three themes emerged from the data: limited evidence base, patient demand and concerns over regulation.

CONCLUSION: Despite recognising the limited evidence base of CAM, GPs continue to see a role for it within clinical practice. This is not necessarily led by patient demand that is highly related to affluence. However, GPs raised concerns over the regulation of CAM practitioners and CAM therapies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)246-53
Number of pages8
JournalPrimary Health Care Research and Development
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2015

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'General practitioners' beliefs about the clinical utility of complementary and alternative medicine'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this