Abstract
Background:
Predicting response to treatment and long-term disability in multiple sclerosis (MS) remains challenging. In other complex diseases, combining genetic risk variants has enabled the detection of relevant clinical endophenotypes associated with important outcomes, but this strategy has never been applied to MS.
Methods:
We applied unsupervised hierarchical clustering to genomic risk scores in a prospective Welsh MS cohort (n=1455) and replicated the findings in the postmortem Netherlands Brain Bank (NBB) MS (NBB-MS) cohort (n=272). Disease progression was assessed using survival analysis to determine the time to Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) milestones.
Results:
Three genomic clusters were identified, each with similar genetic profiles. Baseline demographics did not differ between clusters. Welsh patients in cluster 1 attained EDSS 6 and EDSS 8 significantly later than clusters 2 and 3 (by 6 years, p=3×10−3 and 13 years, p=0.02, respectively). These findings were replicated in the NBB-MS cohort (6-year delay to EDSS 6 for cluster 1 vs 2, p=0.04). Genomic clustering independently predicted disease progression (HRs 1.3–2.0, all p<0.05), beyond established risk factors. Clusters 2 and 3 showed a greater annual increase in T2 lesion load on serial MR imaging (p=0.04). In cluster 2, patients receiving disease-modifying treatments had delayed progression to EDSS 6 (p=3×10−³), while no such benefit was observed in clusters 1 or 3. Cluster 2 patients also had earlier onset of symptoms, including dysphagia (p=0.02) and spasticity (p=8×10−⁴) in the NBB-MS cohort.
Conclusions
Genetic clustering reveals clinically meaningful MS subtypes with distinct prognoses and treatment responses, highlighting its potential role in precision medicine for MS management.
Predicting response to treatment and long-term disability in multiple sclerosis (MS) remains challenging. In other complex diseases, combining genetic risk variants has enabled the detection of relevant clinical endophenotypes associated with important outcomes, but this strategy has never been applied to MS.
Methods:
We applied unsupervised hierarchical clustering to genomic risk scores in a prospective Welsh MS cohort (n=1455) and replicated the findings in the postmortem Netherlands Brain Bank (NBB) MS (NBB-MS) cohort (n=272). Disease progression was assessed using survival analysis to determine the time to Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) milestones.
Results:
Three genomic clusters were identified, each with similar genetic profiles. Baseline demographics did not differ between clusters. Welsh patients in cluster 1 attained EDSS 6 and EDSS 8 significantly later than clusters 2 and 3 (by 6 years, p=3×10−3 and 13 years, p=0.02, respectively). These findings were replicated in the NBB-MS cohort (6-year delay to EDSS 6 for cluster 1 vs 2, p=0.04). Genomic clustering independently predicted disease progression (HRs 1.3–2.0, all p<0.05), beyond established risk factors. Clusters 2 and 3 showed a greater annual increase in T2 lesion load on serial MR imaging (p=0.04). In cluster 2, patients receiving disease-modifying treatments had delayed progression to EDSS 6 (p=3×10−³), while no such benefit was observed in clusters 1 or 3. Cluster 2 patients also had earlier onset of symptoms, including dysphagia (p=0.02) and spasticity (p=8×10−⁴) in the NBB-MS cohort.
Conclusions
Genetic clustering reveals clinically meaningful MS subtypes with distinct prognoses and treatment responses, highlighting its potential role in precision medicine for MS management.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry |
| Early online date | 16 Jan 2026 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 16 Jan 2026 |
Bibliographical note
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.Keywords
- MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS
- Prognosis
- GENETICS
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Genetic subtypes associated with multiple sclerosis severity and response to treatment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver