Abstract
Discussions of group knowledge typically focus on whether a group’s knowledge that p reduces to group members’ knowledge that p. Drawing on the cumulative reading of collective knowledge ascriptions and considerations about the importance of the division of labour, I argue for a more complex relation between individual and collective knowledge in the form of what I call the Fragmented Knowledge account of group knowledge. This account claims that a group can know an answer to a question in virtue of members of the group knowing parts of that answer, when the whole answer is available to group-level action.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1-42 |
Number of pages | 42 |
Journal | Ergo |
Volume | 6 |
Issue number | 33 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Accepted/In press - 16 Jul 2019 |