Growth and stabilization of induced seismicity rates during long-term, low-pressure fluid injection

James P Verdon*, Benjamin Pullen, German Rodriguez

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We examine the temporal evolution of sequences of induced seismicity caused by long-term fluid injection using a compilation of over 20 case studies where moderate magnitude (M > 3.0) induced events have been recorded. We compare rates of seismicity with injection rates via the seismogenic index and seismic efficiency parameters, computing both cumulative and time-windowed values. We find that cumulative values tend to accelerate steeply as each seismicity sequence initiates—most cases reach a value that is within 0.5 units of their maximum value within 1–3 years. Time-windowed values tend to increase to maximum values within 25%–35% of the overall sequence, before decreasing as levels of seismicity stabilize. We interpret these observations with respect to the pore pressure changes that will be generated in highly porous, high permeability reservoirs. In such situations, the rate of pore pressure change is highest during the early phases of injection and decreases with time. If induced seismicity scales with the rate of deformation, which in turn is controlled by the rate of pore pressure change, then it is to be expected that induced seismicity is highest during the early phases of injection, and then decreases with time.
Original languageEnglish
Article number20230183
Number of pages22
JournalPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Physical and Engineering Sciences
Volume382
Issue number2276
Early online date1 Jul 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Aug 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors.

Keywords

  • Induced seismicity
  • earthquake forecasting
  • statistical seismology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Growth and stabilization of induced seismicity rates during long-term, low-pressure fluid injection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this