Health, human rights and the regulation of reproductive technologies in S.H. And others V Austria (application no. 57813/00).

Sheelagh McGuinness

doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwt003

Health, human rights and the regulation of reproductive technologies in S.H. And others V Austria (application no. 57813/00).

Sheelagh McGuinness^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

University of Bristol Law School

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (Academic Journal) › peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

26 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This case note analyses a recent judgment by the European Court of Human Rights involving two married couples who failed in their rights-based challenge to provisions of Austria's Artificial Procreation Act prohibiting heterologous techniques for in vitro fertilisation (i.e. techniques using donor ova and sperm).

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	146-160
Number of pages	15
Journal	Medical Law Review
Volume	21
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwt003
Publication status	Published - Dec 2013

Research Groups and Themes

Centre for Health, Law and Society

Keywords

ECHR
Assisted Reproduction
Health law

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1093/medlaw/fwt003

Handle.net

Persistent link

Cite this

@article{2cac044f63dd437d8170f99745b9efc2,

title = "Health, human rights and the regulation of reproductive technologies in S.H. And others V Austria (application no. 57813/00).",

abstract = "This case note analyses a recent judgment by the European Court of Human Rights involving two married couples who failed in their rights-based challenge to provisions of Austria's Artificial Procreation Act prohibiting heterologous techniques for in vitro fertilisation (i.e. techniques using donor ova and sperm).",

keywords = "ECHR, Assisted Reproduction, Health law",

author = "Sheelagh McGuinness",

year = "2013",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1093/medlaw/fwt003",

language = "English",

volume = "21",

pages = "146--160",

journal = "Medical Law Review",

issn = "1464-3790",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Health, human rights and the regulation of reproductive technologies in S.H. And others V Austria (application no. 57813/00).

AU - McGuinness, Sheelagh

PY - 2013/12

Y1 - 2013/12

N2 - This case note analyses a recent judgment by the European Court of Human Rights involving two married couples who failed in their rights-based challenge to provisions of Austria's Artificial Procreation Act prohibiting heterologous techniques for in vitro fertilisation (i.e. techniques using donor ova and sperm).

AB - This case note analyses a recent judgment by the European Court of Human Rights involving two married couples who failed in their rights-based challenge to provisions of Austria's Artificial Procreation Act prohibiting heterologous techniques for in vitro fertilisation (i.e. techniques using donor ova and sperm).

KW - ECHR

KW - Assisted Reproduction

KW - Health law

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84882964704&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/medlaw/fwt003

DO - 10.1093/medlaw/fwt003

M3 - Article (Academic Journal)

C2 - 23420774

SN - 1464-3790

VL - 21

SP - 146

EP - 160

JO - Medical Law Review

JF - Medical Law Review

IS - 1

ER -

Health, human rights and the regulation of reproductive technologies in S.H. And others V Austria (application no. 57813/00).

Abstract

Research Groups and Themes

Keywords

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Handle.net

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this