Erwin Dekker, Pavel Kuchař

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingEntry for encyclopedia/dictionary

822 Downloads (Pure)


Whenever agents choose A instead of B, B instead of C, and C instead of A, a logical contradiction arises. This contradiction – also known as a value anomaly – characterizes genuine choices. Some organizations and firms, but also legal systems, markets, or even the human brain can be regarded as complex systems that manage the value anomaly by operating with multiple mutually incompatible ordering principles. Such a management – as opposed to a mere elimination – of these mutually incompatible values allows these systems to better cope with uncertainty, and to benefit from the recognition of complexity. One of the central implications of these heterarchical systems is that there is no single scale on which unequals can be compared and, consequently, that commensuration is an active process which involves friction and opportunities for entrepreneurship. We argue that in a world that naturally seems to be characterized by these value anomalies, heterarchical organizations and, in particular, heterarchy as a complex system of valuation might well be a good response.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationEncyclopedia of Law and Economics
EditorsAlain Marciano, Giovanni Battista Ramello
PublisherSpringer, New York, NY
ISBN (Electronic)9781461478836
Publication statusPublished - 21 Aug 2017


Dive into the research topics of 'Heterarchy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this