High classification accuracy does not imply effective genetic search

T Kovacs, M Kerber

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference Contribution (Conference Proceeding)

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Learning classifier systems, their parameterisation, and their rule discovery systems have often been evaluated by measuring classification accuracy on small Boolean functions. We demonstrate that by restricting the rule set to the initial random population (that is, a random discretisation of the input space), high classification accuracy can still be achieved, and that on relatively small functions this requires few rules. We argue that this demonstrates that high classification accuracy on small functions is not evidence of effective rule discovery. However, we argue that small functions can nonetheless be used to evaluate rule discovery when a certain more powerful type of metric is used.
Translated title of the contributionHigh classification accuracy does not imply effective genetic search
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationUnknown
PublisherSpringer
Pages785 - 796
Number of pages11
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2004

Bibliographical note

Conference Proceedings/Title of Journal: Proceedings of the 2004 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO), LNCS Vol. 3102

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'High classification accuracy does not imply effective genetic search'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this