History and Policy memorandum submitted to the House of Commons Work and Pensions Committee : Pension reform

HR Pemberton, Pat Thane, Noel Whiteside

Research output: Working paperWorking paper and Preprints

48 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The last major review of British pensions, the Beveridge Report (1942), established fundamental principles: subsistence level benefits; rational, uniform administration; universal compulsory cover; and uniform state pension rights. Contrary to a belief perpetuated by the Work and Pensions Secretary, the Attlee government largely ignored the central principles of the Beveridge Report, causing many of the current problems with the pensions system. The Turner Commission returned to many of Beveridge’s basic principles in its second report A New Pensions Settlement for the Twenty-first Century. In its 2006 Pensions White Paper, the government abandoned most of these, retaining many of the weaknesses in the present system, including: continuing poor levels of pension in Britain, not least for women; a lower state pension at 68 for claimants than would be the case today; means tested benefits for one-third of future pensioners; enhanced levels of individual consumer risk; administrative complexity, and elevated costs; no independent governing body or cross-party consensus The White Paper meets the government’s affordability test: the provisional commitment to restore the earnings link makes official priorities clear. But, it fails tests of simplicity, transparency, political viability and social justice. Under its proposals, British state pensions will remain among the worst in the western world.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jun 2006

Bibliographical note

Additional information: History and Policy was founded by a group of professional historians at London and
Cambridge Universities, and now involves a network of historians around the UK. They
believe that today’s ‘evidence-based’ policy environment is hampered by a lack of
historical input and a reluctance to involve historians. This can result in flawed decisions
based on inaccurate historical assumptions.
History and Policy addresses the lack of communication between historians and those in
government, parliament, think-tanks and the media, who are analysing, discussing and
deciding policy. We make historians and their work more accessible to policy and media
audiences, enabling them to make better use of history in addressing current issues.
See http://www.historyandpolicy.org for more details.

Keywords

  • pensions

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'History and Policy memorandum submitted to the House of Commons Work and Pensions Committee : Pension reform'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this