Home and Online Management and Evaluation of Blood Pressure (HOME BP) using a digital intervention in poorly controlled hypertension: Randomised controlled trial

Richard McManus*, Paul Little, Beth Stuart, Katherine Morton, James Raftery, Jo Kelly, Katherine J. Bradbury, Jin Zhang, Shihua Zhu, Elizabeth Murray, Carl R May, Frances Mair, Susan F Michie, Peter Smith, Rebecca Band, Emma Ogburn, Julie Allen, Cathy Rice, Jacqui Nuttall, Bryan WilliamsLucy Yardley

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective: The HOME BP (Home and Online Management and Evaluation of Blood Pressure) trial aimed to test a digital intervention for hypertension management in primary care by combining self-monitoring of blood pressure with guided self-management.
Design: Unmasked randomised controlled trial with automated ascertainment of primary endpoint.
Setting: 76 general practices in the United Kingdom.
Participants: 622 people with treated but poorly controlled hypertension (>140/90 mm Hg) and access to the internet.
Interventions: Participants were randomised by using a minimisation algorithm to self-monitoring of blood pressure with a digital intervention (305 participants) or usual care (routine hypertension care, with appointments and drug changes made at the discretion of the general practitioner; 317 participants). The digital intervention provided feedback of blood pressure results to patients and professionals with optional lifestyle advice and motivational support. Target blood pressure for hypertension, diabetes, and people aged 80 or older followed UK national guidelines.
Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was the difference in systolic blood pressure (mean of second and third readings) after one year, adjusted for baseline blood pressure, blood pressure target, age, and practice, with multiple imputation for missing values.
Results: After one year, data were available from 552 participants (88.6%) with imputation for the remaining 70 participants (11.4%). Mean blood pressure dropped from 151.7/86.4 to 138.4/80.2 mm Hg in the intervention group and from 151.6/85.3 to 141.8/79.8 mm Hg in the usual care group, giving a mean difference in systolic blood pressure of −3.4 mm Hg (95% confidence interval −6.1 to −0.8 mm Hg) and a mean difference in diastolic blood pressure of −0.5 mm Hg (−1.9 to 0.9 mm Hg). Results were comparable in the complete case analysis and adverse effects were similar between groups. Within trial costs showed an incremental cost effectiveness ratio of £11 ($15, €12; 95% confidence interval £6 to £29) per mm Hg reduction.
Conclusions: The HOME BP digital intervention for the management of hypertension by using self-monitored blood pressure led to better control of systolic blood pressure after one year than usual care, with low incremental costs. Implementation in primary care will require integration into clinical workflows and consideration of people who are digitally excluded.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberm4858
JournalBMJ Open
Volume372
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Jan 2021

Structured keywords

  • Physical and Mental Health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Home and Online Management and Evaluation of Blood Pressure (HOME BP) using a digital intervention in poorly controlled hypertension: Randomised controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this