Homogeneity in the Instrument-exposure Association and Point Estimation Using Binary Instrumental Variables

Fernando Pires Hartwig*, Linbo Wang, George Davey Smith, Neil M Davies

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
12 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background:
Interpreting instrumental variable results often requires further assumptions in addition to the core assumptions of relevance, independence, and the exclusion restriction.

Methods:
We assess whether instrument-exposure additive homogeneity renders the Wald estimand equal to the average derivative effect (ADE) in the case of a binary instrument and a continuous exposure.

Results:
Instrument-exposure additive homogeneity is insufficient for ADE identification when the instrument is binary, the exposure is continuous, and the effect of the exposure on the outcome is nonlinear on the additive scale. For a binary exposure, the exposure-outcome effect is necessarily additive linear, so the homogeneity condition is sufficient.

Conclusions:
For binary instruments, instrument-exposure additive homogeneity identifies the ADE if the exposure is also binary. Otherwise, additional assumptions (such as additive linearity of the exposure-outcome effect) are required.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)828-831
Number of pages4
JournalEpidemiology
Volume33
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Causal inference
  • Instrumental variables
  • Causal effect
  • Identification
  • Homogeneity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Homogeneity in the Instrument-exposure Association and Point Estimation Using Binary Instrumental Variables'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this