Honour in UK Copyright Law is Not ‘A Trim Reckoning’ – Its Impact on the Integrity Right and the Destruction of Works of Art

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
544 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The meaning of ‘honour’ in section 80 of the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 is not easily ascertained. There has been a tendency for academics and judges to either equate the concept of ‘honour’ with that of ‘reputation’, or to ignore its presence altogether. The author will propose that there is little to justify such treatment of this concept. This article offers a reinterpretation of the concept by analysis of anthropological theories of honour and of the Roman law of iniuria. By applying such reinterpretation, it is argued the concept of honour would play a far more significant role in articulating the integrity right under section 80 than previously envisaged. In particular, by interpreting ‘honour’ as a right to respect, it opens up the possibilities of recognising the artist’s right to object to the destruction of their works, a right which is presently unrecognised in UK copyright law.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)272-303
Number of pages32
JournalOxford Journal of Legal Studies
Volume36
Issue number2
Early online date17 Sep 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2016

Keywords

  • copyright
  • moral rights
  • art
  • honour
  • anthropology
  • iniuria

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Honour in UK Copyright Law is Not ‘A Trim Reckoning’ – Its Impact on the Integrity Right and the Destruction of Works of Art'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this