Abstract
The meaning of ‘honour’ in section 80 of the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 is not easily ascertained. There has been a tendency for academics and judges to either equate the concept of ‘honour’ with that of ‘reputation’, or to ignore its presence altogether. The author will propose that there is little to justify such treatment of this concept. This article offers a reinterpretation of the concept by analysis of anthropological theories of honour and of the Roman law of iniuria. By applying such reinterpretation, it is argued the concept of honour would play a far more significant role in articulating the integrity right under section 80 than previously envisaged. In particular, by interpreting ‘honour’ as a right to respect, it opens up the possibilities of recognising the artist’s right to object to the destruction of their works, a right which is presently unrecognised in UK copyright law.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 272-303 |
Number of pages | 32 |
Journal | Oxford Journal of Legal Studies |
Volume | 36 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 17 Sep 2015 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jun 2016 |
Keywords
- copyright
- moral rights
- art
- honour
- anthropology
- iniuria