Hospital differences in death rates after hip fracture surgery in Denmark: A multilevel approach for evaluating variation in 30-day mortality after hip fracture in a population-based cohort study

P K Kristensen, Juan Merlo, N Ghith, George Leckie, S P Johnsen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)
182 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background:
Thirty-day mortality after hip fracture is widely used when ranking hospital performance, but the reliability of such hospital ranking is seldom calculated. We aimed to quantify the variation in 30-day mortality across hospitals and to determine the hospital general contextual effect for understanding patient differences in 30-day mortality risk.

Methods:
Patients aged ≥65 years with an incident hip fracture registered in the Danish Multidisciplinary Fracture Registry between 2007 and 2016 were identified (n=60,004). We estimated unadjusted and patient-mix adjusted risk of 30-day mortality in 32 hospitals. We performed multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy with patients nested within hospitals. We expressed the hospital general contextual effect by the Median Odds Ratio, the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve and the variance partition coefficient.

Results:
The overall 30-day mortality rate was 10%. Patient characteristics including high
sociodemographic risk score, underweight, comorbidity, a subtrochanteric fracture and living at a nursing home were strong predictors of 30-day mortality (area under the curve= 0.728). The adjusted differences between hospital averages in 30-day mortality varied from 5% to 9% across the 32 hospitals, which correspond to a median odds ratio of 1.18 (95% CI: 1.12-1.25). However, the hospital general context effect was low, as the variance partition coefficient was below 1% and adding the hospital level to a single-level model with adjustment for patient-mix increased the area under the receiver operating characteristics
curve by only 0.004 units.

Conclusions:
Only minor hospital differences were found in 30-day mortality after hip fracture. Mortality after hip fracture needs to be lowered in Denmark but possible interventions should be patient oriented and universal rather than focused on specific hospitals
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)605 - 614
Number of pages10
JournalClinical Epidemiology
Volume11 (2019)
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Jul 2019

Research Groups and Themes

  • SoE Centre for Multilevel Modelling

Keywords

  • 30-day mortality
  • multilevel analysis
  • hospital variance
  • Hip fracture

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Hospital differences in death rates after hip fracture surgery in Denmark: A multilevel approach for evaluating variation in 30-day mortality after hip fracture in a population-based cohort study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this