Abstract
Comments on R. v Magson (Emma-Jayne) (CA) on whether a woman's conviction for murdering her partner was unsafe on the basis that the judge erred in failing to give a jury direction on the "householder defence". Details the relevance of whether she genuinely believed her partner to be a trespasser.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 81-84 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | The Criminal Law Review |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue number | 2023 |
| Publication status | Published - 25 Jan 2023 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities -
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008
- Householder defence
- criminal law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Householder Defence: R. v Magson'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver