How background complexity impairs target detection

Zeke W Rowe*, Nicholas E Scott-Samuel, Innes C Cuthill

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Camouflage is frequently used by animals for concealment and thereby improves survival. Typically, it is the animal’s own colour and patterning which is expected to affect its detectability; however the complexity of the background can also have an influence. Although there is a growing literature examining this, the underlying exact mechanism is unknown. In this paper we address this issue by using humans as proxy ‘predators’ in a computer-based search task and monitoring their detection times for targets on varying backgrounds. By using artificial greyscale targets and backgrounds, we were able to isolate and manipulate the normally covarying factors which comprise ‘complexity’ in natural habitats. We show that reduced detection is not explained by greater information content (entropy) or higher variance in the background’s features per se, but instead by reduced signal-to-noise ratio in the visual features that potentially distinguish target from background. This raises questions about when the term complexity should be used, and how observers learn the characteristics of a background
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)99-111
Number of pages13
JournalAnimal Behaviour
Volume210
Early online date21 Feb 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How background complexity impairs target detection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this