Abstract
Camouflage is frequently used by animals for concealment and thereby improves survival. Typically, it is the animal’s own colour and patterning which is expected to affect its detectability; however the complexity of the background can also have an influence. Although there is a growing literature examining this, the underlying exact mechanism is unknown. In this paper we address this issue by using humans as proxy ‘predators’ in a computer-based search task and monitoring their detection times for targets on varying backgrounds. By using artificial greyscale targets and backgrounds, we were able to isolate and manipulate the normally covarying factors which comprise ‘complexity’ in natural habitats. We show that reduced detection is not explained by greater information content (entropy) or higher variance in the background’s features per se, but instead by reduced signal-to-noise ratio in the visual features that potentially distinguish target from background. This raises questions about when the term complexity should be used, and how observers learn the characteristics of a background
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 99-111 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Animal Behaviour |
Volume | 210 |
Early online date | 21 Feb 2024 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Apr 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2024 The Author(s)