How Can Urodynamic Innovations be Better Integrated Into the Clinical Pathway? ICI-RS 2025

Andrew Gammie*, Francesco Clavica, Thomas Gray, Faezeh Arab Hassani, Eskinder Solomon, Qi‐Xiang Song, John E. Speich, Françoise Valentini, Chris Harding

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

Abstract

Background
Urodynamics has seen, in common with any medical field reliant upon technology, many recent advances in the application of innovations. Novel and effective ideas have been developed and marketed, but relatively few have been incorporated into clinical practice.

Methods
A debate held at the International Consultation on Incontinence–Research Society (ICI-RS) meeting in Bristol, UK, in June 2025 looked at new technology and its possible inclusion into the patient pathway.

Results
Discussion acknowledged that new ideas have not always been comprehensively examined, assessed, or applied. The meeting considered ways to rectify this gap and proposed research that is needed to give evidence-based take-up of innovation in this field.

Conclusions
We propose a tool that examines the time, costs, and a test's specificity and sensitivity for each patient group, to suggest an optimal pathway for that group. The meeting also concluded that techniques involving ultrasound and catheter-free monitoring hold promise and proposed research needed to promote the take-up of innovation in this field.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages8
JournalNeurourology and Urodynamics
Early online date6 Nov 2025
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 6 Nov 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How Can Urodynamic Innovations be Better Integrated Into the Clinical Pathway? ICI-RS 2025'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this