Skip to content

How do they measure up? Differences in stakeholder perceptions of quality measures used in English community nursing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Health Services Research and Policy
Early online date8 Oct 2019
DOIs
DateAccepted/In press - 18 Jul 2019
DateE-pub ahead of print (current) - 8 Oct 2019

Abstract

Objectives
To establish how quality indicators used in English community nursing are selected and applied, and their perceived usefulness to service users, commissioners and service providers.

Methods
A qualitative multi-site case study was conducted with five commissioning organizations and their service providers. Participants included commissioners, provider organization managers, nurses and service users.

Results
Indicator selection and application often entail complex processes influenced by wider health system and cross-organizational factors. All participants felt that current indicators, while useful for accountability and management purposes, fail to reflect the true quality of community nursing care and may sometimes indirectly compromise care.

Conclusions
Valuable resources may be better used for comprehensive system redesign, to ensure that patient, carer and nurse priorities are given equivalence with those of other stakeholders.

    Research areas

  • clinical commissioning groups, community care, nurses, quality indicators

Download statistics

No data available

Documents

Documents

  • Full-text PDF (final published version)

    Rights statement: This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via SAGE Publications at https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1355819619868506 . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Final published version, 280 KB, PDF document

    Licence: CC BY-NC

DOI

View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups