How Does the Substantial Modification of a Public Contract Affect its Legal Regime?

Václav Janeček, Jan Brodec

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

Abstract

This article outlines the fundamental consequences for the legal regime of public contracts which result from the substantial modifications of such contracts within the meaning of EU law. The authors conclude that an EU law-compliant understanding of the term 'substantial modification to public contracts' may result, in some national legal systems, in the 'privative novation' of the original contract, ie in its complete discharge and replacement with a new contract. However, this may be associated with a number of negative implications impairing the principle of legal certainty, thereby indirectly affecting the efficient functioning of the EU’s internal market. This conclusion appears to be contrary to the objectives pursued by the doctrine of indirect effect of EU law. The authors show some viable solutions to this problem, both from the position of contracting authorities and courts, and from the perspective of the member states in the forthcoming implementation of the new EU Public Procurement Directives.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)90-105
JournalPublic Procurement Law Review
Volume24
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Research Groups and Themes

  • Centre for Private and Commercial law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How Does the Substantial Modification of a Public Contract Affect its Legal Regime?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this