Skip to content

How important are model structural and contextual uncertainties when estimating the optimized performance of water resource systems?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2170-2193
Number of pages24
JournalWater Resources Research
Issue number3
Early online date19 Feb 2019
DateAccepted/In press - 10 Feb 2019
DateE-pub ahead of print - 19 Feb 2019
DatePublished (current) - 1 Mar 2019


Uncertainty in simulating water resource systems (WRSs) makes it difficult to assess how effective different water management decisions will be. Uncertainty in simulation models can undermine the credibility of simulation and optimization studies and the uptake of their results. We identify different sources of uncertainty in WRS models and find that structural uncertainty (i.e., around definition of interrelationships within the system) and contextual uncertainty (i.e., around definition of the system boundaries) are rarely considered when simulating and optimizing WRSs. We propose a methodology to quantify the effects of structural and contextual uncertainties on the estimated performance of optimized water management decisions and demonstrate that they have a significant impact on a real-world case study of a pumped-storage system in the UK. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to consider the impact of these types of uncertainty on optimized operating policies and their simulated performances. Our main finding is that of all the considered uncertainties, the assumptions made about context—specifically around the level of cooperation between neighboring water companies—had the greatest impact on performance estimates. This is important because few WRSs exist in isolation, yet discussion of the effects that a given definition of the system boundaries have on the simulation/optimization results is uncommon. We also highlight the significance of adequately considering aleatory uncertainty when evaluating performance estimates—something that few studies do—and present a simple technique to justify the sample size used for the evaluation of optimization results.

    Research areas

  • decision making under uncertainty, multiobjective optimization, reservoirs, system operation and management, water management

Download statistics

No data available



  • Full-text PDF (accepted author manuscript)

    Rights statement: This is the accepted author manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Wiley at . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Accepted author manuscript, 1 MB, PDF document

    Licence: Other


View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups