Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

How to assess similarities and differences between mantle circulation models and Earth using disparate independent observations

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (Academic Journal) › peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Mantle circulation in the Earth acts to remove heat from its interior and is thus a critical driver of our planet’s internal and surface evolution. Numerical mantle circulation models (MCMs)driven by plate motion history allow us to model relevant physical and chemical processes and help answer questions related to mantle properties and circulation. Predictions from MCM scan be tested using a variety of observations. Here, we illustrate how the combination of many disparate observations leads to constraints on mantle circulation across space and time. We present this approach by first describing the setup of the example test MCM, including the parameterisation of melting, and the methodology used to obtain elastic Earth models. We subsequently describe different constraints, that either provide information about present-day mantle (e.g. seismic velocity structure and surface deflection) or its temporal evolution (e.g. geomagnetic reversal frequency, geochemical isotope ratios and temperature of upper mantle sampled by lavas).We illustrate the information that each observation provides by applying it to a single MCM. In future work, we will apply these observational constraints to a large number of MCMs, which will allow us to address questions related to Earth-like mantle circulation.
Original languageEnglish
Article number20240827
Number of pages30
JournalProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences
Volume481
Issue number2315
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Jun 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Authors.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How to assess similarities and differences between mantle circulation models and Earth using disparate independent observations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this