Abstract
We analyse Kreisel’s notion of human-effective computability. Like Kreisel, we relate this notion to a concept of informal provability, but we disagree with Kreisel about the precise way in which this is best done. The resulting two different ways of analysing human-effective computability give rise to two different variants of Church’s thesis. These are both investigated by relating them to transfinite progressions of formal theories in the sense of Feferman.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | nky011 |
| Pages (from-to) | 61-87 |
| Number of pages | 27 |
| Journal | Philosophia Mathematica |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 24 Jun 2018 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 15 Feb 2019 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Human-effective computability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver